Why it has been translated to "char[0]" ? For me "char*" would have been more appropriate.
char[] ported from C to char[0] in the D core library
badlink via Digitalmars-d-learn Wed, 09 Sep 2015 09:52:17 -0700
The struct core.sys.linux.sys.inotify.inotify_event contains the
field "char[0] name" which corresponds to "char name[]" in C.
- char[] ported from C to char[0] in t... badlink via Digitalmars-d-learn
- Re: char[] ported from C to cha... Adam D. Ruppe via Digitalmars-d-learn
- Re: char[] ported from C to... badlink via Digitalmars-d-learn
- Re: char[] ported from C to cha... Alex Parrill via Digitalmars-d-learn
- Re: char[] ported from C to... badlink via Digitalmars-d-learn