On Sunday, 13 September 2015 at 17:16:02 UTC, ponce wrote:
On Sunday, 13 September 2015 at 17:00:30 UTC, Ola Fosheim
Grøstad wrote:
On Sunday, 13 September 2015 at 16:53:20 UTC, ponce wrote:
GC is basically ok for anything soft-realtime, where you
already spend a lot of time to go fast enough. And if you
want hard-realtime, well you wouldn't want malloc either.
It's a non-problem.
If this was true then Go would not have a concurrent collector.
I was speaking of the D language.
Of course, that makes it make sense!
