On Friday, 18 September 2015 at 13:18:23 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
On 2015-09-16 12:36, Marc Schütz wrote:
Wouldn't the following behaviour be more useful as a default?
abstract class Foo {
void bar1() { } // non-abstract, obviously
void bar2(); // abstract, because it's in an
abstract class
// (different from now)
extern void bar3(); // non-abstract, but defined
externally
}
Currently "extern" has the meaning, at least on Windows, that
the symbol will be visible outside a dynamic library.
That's `export`.
