On Saturday, 26 September 2015 at 13:09:54 UTC, Meta wrote:
On Saturday, 26 September 2015 at 12:33:45 UTC, anonymous wrote:
foreach (f; parallel(iota(1, 1000000+1)))
{
synchronized i += f;
}
Is this valid syntax? I've never seen synchronized used like
this before.
I'm sure it's valid.
A mutex is created for that instance of synchronized. I.e., only
one thread can execute that piece of code at a time.
If you're missing the braces, they're optional for single
statements, as usual.
http://dlang.org/statement.html#SynchronizedStatement
