On Monday, 28 September 2015 at 11:04:56 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
On Sat, 2015-09-26 at 10:46 +0000, John Colvin via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
[…]
I guess the summary is: it's a breaking change, so do it. No we
can't do that it's a breaking change.
Seems lame given all the other breaking changes that have been.
Sad given that reduce is probably the single most important
operation in parallel programming.
My thoughts exactly, even though it was partly me that pointed
out the breaking changes...
I still think we should add fold[lr]? just to fix the ordering.
