On Friday, 16 October 2015 at 15:48:59 UTC, Edwin van Leeuwen wrote:
Just wondering if anyone has any tips on how to solve/avoid "cannot deduce function from argument types" when relying on template programming.

I run into these problems all the time. Current one was when I tried:

```
auto ys = NumericLabel(groupedAes.front.map!((t)=>t.y));
```

NumericLabel is a pretty minimal templated InputRange, with as only requirement on the argument that it is also an InputRange. I then get the following compile error:

```
source/ggplotd/geom.d(83,35): Error: struct ggplotd.aes.NumericLabel cannot ded uce function from argument types !()(MapResult!(__lambda2, FilterResult!(__lamb da2, Aes!(double[], "x", double[], "y", string[], "colour")))), candidates are: source/ggplotd/aes.d(515,1): ggplotd.aes.NumericLabel(T) if (isInputRang
e!T)
```

As far as I know MapResult always returns an input range and as you can see there is only one candidate of NumericLabel, so to be honest it looks relatively straightforward to me.

Now I can define the type specifically (and/or typeof) but it seems like there should be a better way.

In this case typeof isn't even happy:
```
source/ggplotd/geom.d(84,17): Error: constructor ggplotd.aes.NumericLabel!(MapResult!(__lambda2, FilterResult!(__lambda2, Aes!(string[], "x", string[], "y", string[], "colour")))).NumericLabel.this (MapResult!(__lambda2, FilterResult!(__lambda2, Aes!(string[], "x", string[], "y", string[], "colour"))) range) is not callable using argument types (MapResult!(__lambda3, FilterResult!(__lambda2, Aes!(string[], "x", string[], "y", string[], "colour"))))
```

If we look closely, it expects a __lambda2 as the MapResult argument, but it gets a __lambda3.


I am able to work around it by converting the mapresult to an array, but I'd rather use a lazy solution.

My first steps would be to try

pragma(msg, isInputRange!(typeof(groupedAes.front.map!((t)=>t.y))));
followed by
pragma(msg, isInputRange!(typeof(groupedAes.front)));
then
pragma(msg, typeof(groupedAes.front));

to see at what level it's going wrong.

Reply via email to