Hello. I was trying to do something like this: ubyte code = to!ubyte(spec, 6) + 16;
and got an error saying: cannot implicitly convert expression (cast(int)to(spec, 6) + 16) of type int to ubyte Looking at http://dlang.org/spec/lex.html#IntegerLiteral, sure enough 16 is specified to be inferred as an `int`. I thought that integer literals used to be inferred as the smallest integral type that can fit them – am I mistaken? -- Shriramana Sharma, Penguin #395953
