On Wednesday, 13 January 2016 at 19:05:30 UTC, Josh Phillips
wrote:
Oh wow that's easy. They should really make that more clear in
the dlang reference. They way it sounds there made me think
that if a function doesn't throw any errors it automatically is
'nothrow'
No, because actually you can have a function that uses
sub-functions that throw, but marked explicitly nothrow, because
it hides the stuff under the carpet.
---
void bar()
{
throw new Exception("kaboom");
}
void foo() nothrow
{
try {bar;}
catch {/*under the carpet*/}
}
---
and that will compile.
