Re: is increment on shared ulong atomic operation?

[rsw0x via Digitalmars-d-learn]

On Sunday, 7 February 2016 at 20:25:44 UTC, Minas Mina wrote:

On Sunday, 7 February 2016 at 19:43:23 UTC, rsw0x wrote:

On Sunday, 7 February 2016 at 19:39:27 UTC, rsw0x wrote:

On Sunday, 7 February 2016 at 19:27:19 UTC, Charles Hixson wrote:

[...]

https://dlang.org/phobos/core_atomic.html#.atomicOp

Just noticed that there's no example.
It's used like

shared(ulong) a;
atomicOp!"+="(a, 1);

Wow, that syntax sucks a lot.

how so?
It's meant to be very explicit