Am Tue, 09 Feb 2016 00:38:10 +0000 schrieb tsbockman <[email protected]>:
> On Sunday, 7 February 2016 at 02:11:15 UTC, Marco Leise wrote: > > What I like most about your proposal is that it doesn't break > > any existing code that wasn't broken before. That can't be > > emphasized enough. > > Although I wish more than 3 people had voted in my poll, two of > them did claim to need the `ref`-ness of `Tuple.slice`, so I > don't think we can just ditch it. (I did not vote.) > > If you guys want to add a return-by-value version, it should be > treated as an enhancement, not a bug fix in my opinion. As mentioned I never used the feature myself and wont vote for one or the other. Three people with no source code to exemplify current use of .slice! is indeed not much to base decisions on and both fixes yield unexpected results in different contexts that warrant bug reports. -- Marco
