On Saturday, 13 February 2016 at 03:16:09 UTC, cym13 wrote:
On Saturday, 13 February 2016 at 02:17:17 UTC, Xinok wrote:
On Friday, 12 February 2016 at 20:43:24 UTC, Taylor Hillegeist
wrote:
So I have this code and I have to add the element
.each!(a => a.each!("a"));
to the end in order for it to evaluate the range completely
and act like I expect it too. Is there a better thing to put
in the place of
.each!(a => a.each!("a"));?
...
The following combination might work:
.joiner.each;
http://dlang.org/phobos/std_algorithm_iteration.html#.joiner
http://dlang.org/phobos/std_algorithm_iteration.html#.each
Why not just .each; ?
The thing he's trying to iterate over is a range of ranges. A
single .each will only iterate over the outermost range so you
need .joiner first to "flatten" the range, then you can use .each
on that result.
