On 02/18/2016 12:12 PM, Ali Çehreli wrote:
> > Hmm, why does the destructor of object 60 run in the middle of
nowhere?
>
> It so happens that the GC decides to collect when moving the array to a
> new location at that point. If you add the following to the beginning of
> main, you will see that the next object to destroy is 59, then 58, etc.
>
> import core.memory;
> GC.disable;
>
> So, everything makes sense other than throwing in a destructor having
> issues with the current GC. :-/
No, it doesn't make sense to me anymore.
All we're doing here is growing an array. There shouldn't be any
destructor calls when just doing that, no? As the array grows, the
elements should be "moved" to the new location; why the destructor? I
hope this is related to the recent fix.
Ali
