On Saturday, 2 April 2016 at 18:32:03 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I honestly think you are better off just generating random arrays, even if it results in some overlap (unlikely to be relevant).

-Steve

Yes I know, I've realized how it's silly. just foreach(xn; 0 .. range) foreach(xn; 0 .. range) foreach(xn; 0 .. range) foreach(xn; 0 .. range) is enough. But still silly in term of complexity. I have to go for a heuristic approach. UNtil that I still use a prng.

Reply via email to