On Thursday, 7 April 2016 at 10:02:05 UTC, Andrea Fontana wrote:
On Wednesday, 6 April 2016 at 20:30:33 UTC, Jonathan Villa
wrote:
On Wednesday, 6 April 2016 at 19:54:32 UTC, Jonathan Villa
wrote:
I wrote a little program that given some number it generates a
TL;DR: My program generates a very large `ubyte[][]`, and
after I call destroy and GC.collect() and GC.minimize(), the
memory occuping doesn't seems to decrease.
Anything change if you wrap your code like:
while ...
{
...
{
ubyte[][] ...
...
}
GC.collect();
GC.minimieze();
}
?
Or maybe you could try to do:
combs = null;
before collecting.
