On 5/2/16 6:00 PM, sigod wrote:
On Monday, 2 May 2016 at 10:15:04 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
On Monday, 2 May 2016 at 08:46:31 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
[...]
Warning (better: disallowing altogether) about `=>` directly followed
by `{` should be enough to cover all cases. To express that you really
want a lambda returning a lambda, it can be rewritten either as:
(x) => () { assert(x); }
or as:
(x) => ({ assert(x); })
This check can be done purely by looking at the tokens. Should we
someday introduce tuples with `{}`, the check needs to be done after
the node starting with `{` has been parsed to distinguish between
delegate and tuple literals.
It's good idea. I myself stumbled into this before.
Agree.
-Steve
