On Monday, 22 August 2016 at 19:09:34 UTC, Jack Applegame wrote:
On Monday, 22 August 2016 at 18:04:43 UTC, Engine Machine wrote:
How do you seriously think this is cleaner/simpler?
1. No extra encrypted things, such as InstantiateOrEmptySeq
2. Much more understandable.
You have two classes.
No. I have one template with two specializations. Class
template and class is not the same thing.
Their is no uniformity between them.
They have the same name. This is the best uniformity.
You have uniformity between all the derived classes then have
a special case for the base class. A certain easy to follow
pattern is set up but needlessly break it for one case. Why?
Because it is the base class. It has no parent. Also this is
the standard and well known pattern in template metaprogramming.
I'm sorry if it confuses you... it doesn't confuse me. I do not
know why you have to try and prove something that is a
preference. Do you often get in to arguments with people about
how ford is better than chevy or blonds are better than brunettes?
