On Monday, 3 October 2016 at 19:25:59 UTC, Uranuz wrote:
When I pass empty string to splitter in most of languages I
expect to get list with 1 item (empty string) as a result, but
I get error instead. And I see inconsistency in that .front
behaves normally, but .back is not. Usually I access front of
range directly without any check when I expect it to have
exactly 1 item. But in this case it not working and is very
strange.
Hm, if front works but not back that is probably a bug.
I think checking whether the range is empty before accessing the
member should be a viable workaround.
