On 10/17/2016 11:40 AM, Nordlöw wrote:
On Monday, 17 October 2016 at 18:22:53 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
It still feels like x["a"] could return a proxy that could later add a
new element and then apply ~= on it. (I haven't read the rest of your
code to see whether you've already done that.)
`Array` is in essence a C++-style array container (pointer, length,
capacity) with C-style memory management. Nothing else.
Have I done something wrong with ~= overloads perhaps?
opOpAssign? (I need to stop guessing without coding. :) )
Ali