On Monday, 2 May 2016 at 17:43:56 UTC, Namespace wrote:
immutable auto a = [1,2,3].s;
Will that have zero run-time overhead compared to: immutable int[3] a = [1,2,3]; ?
Nordlöw via Digitalmars-d-learn Tue, 18 Oct 2016 03:40:45 -0700
On Monday, 2 May 2016 at 17:43:56 UTC, Namespace wrote:
immutable auto a = [1,2,3].s;
Will that have zero run-time overhead compared to: immutable int[3] a = [1,2,3]; ?