On Saturday, 19 November 2016 at 12:55:57 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
On Saturday, 19 November 2016 at 11:11:36 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
On Saturday, 19 November 2016 at 09:38:38 UTC, Marduk wrote:
The difference is that D is more verbose. Am I missing
something? Can we have C's behaviour in D?
Something like
auto I(T)(T im)
if (isNumeric!T)
{
return complex(0, im);
}
unittest
{
auto x = 1 + 2.I;
}
Or simply:
enum I = complex(0, 1);
auto x = 1 + 2*I;
Thanks! That's a clever idea.
What I do not understand is why if I declare the array with
Complex!double I need to complexify each entry. I would expect
that D automatically casts 0.0 to complex(0.0).