On Monday, 12 December 2016 at 14:27:07 UTC, Orut wrote:
The code works beautifully! Thank you very much. Will certainly acknowledge you as source of this code if this becomes of part of a bigger project. I hope others searching this forum would also discover this code.
It could probably use some minor cleanup, documentation and proper unittests and constraints, moving to unsigned size_t; If front is used more than once than there's inefficiency with memory and remaking the array it builds (among other things). Could even make an opIndex for creating specific iterations of the results.
But for it's simplicity I hope it does what you need. It really wasn't that hard to make.
