On Monday, 13 March 2017 at 14:15:05 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Monday, 13 March 2017 at 14:09:58 UTC, Inquie wrote:
Yeah, so, surely though we can extract the names from the
variable and then supply those like I mentioned?
Yeah, we prolly could, but a simpler thing might be to just use
typeof:
Tuple!(int, "A")[] x;
x ~= typeof(x[0])(3);
x ~= tuple!x(3)
? Seems like it would probably be rather trivial with a bit of
template code?
Yeah, tuple could certainly adapt to do that too, but I see you
would write:
x ~= tuple!typeof(x)(3, 5.0);
and the `tuple!` there is unnecessary: if you already use
`typeof(x[0])` (you still need a `[0]` in there to get the type
of the element instead of the array), then you can just
construct it right there with the next set of parens.
Yeah, I didn't know one could do that. Seems to be better ;)
Thanks.
