On Friday, 9 June 2017 at 20:27:58 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 06/09/2017 12:29 PM, Honey wrote:

> I think, I should not rely on standard library facilities.

I think you hit a Phobos function with particularly bad performance (which can be improved). Phobos is not a slow library in general.

What I meant to say is: the comparison would have been less biased if I had written the complete algorithm without relying on different standard library abstractions (iterators vs. ranges).

Reply via email to