Re: Funny issue with casting double to ulong

[Saurabh Das via Digitalmars-d-learn]

On Monday, 3 July 2017 at 03:57:25 UTC, Basile B wrote:

On Monday, 3 July 2017 at 03:50:14 UTC, Saurabh Das wrote:

[...]

6.251 has no perfect double representation. It's real value is:

    6.21509999999999962483343551867E0

Hence when you cast to ulong after the product by 10_000, this is the equivalent of

    trunc(62150.9999999999962483343551867E0)

which gives 62150

CQFD ;-]

That explains it!

Thank you.