On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 4:15 PM, Simon Bürger via Digitalmars-d-learn < digitalmars-d-learn@puremagic.com> wrote:
> On Tuesday, 10 October 2017 at 13:48:16 UTC, Andrea Fontana wrote: > >> On Tuesday, 10 October 2017 at 13:36:56 UTC, Simon Bürger wrote: >> >>> Is there a good way to set them all to zero? The only way I can think of >>> is using string-mixins to generate a string such as "[0,0,0,0]" with >>> exactly n zeroes. But that seems quite an overkill for such a basic task. I >>> suspect I might be missing something obvious here... >>> >> >> Maybe: >> >> double[n] bar = 0.repeat(n).array; >> > > This works fine, thanks a lot. I would have expected `.array` to return a > dynamic array. But apparently the compiler is smart enough to know the > length. Even the multi-dimensional case works fine: > > double[n][n] bar = 0.repeat(n).array.repeat(n).array; > It will return dynamic array. it is same as: double[5] = [0,0,0,0,0]; // this is still dynamicaly allocated.
