On Tuesday, 31 October 2017 at 04:08:12 UTC, Joel wrote:
if (int bar = foo() != 0) {
Not a bug, but I do think it is an iffy design. That is more like: int bar; if(bar = (foo() != 0))so the foo != 0 is evaluated first, which ends up being boolean true or false, then THAT true/false value is converted to int and assigned to bar, hence it becomes 0 or 1.
You can't really combine declaration and non-trivial comparison in a single statement.
