Re: Is Nullable supposed to provide Optional semantics?

[Chris Paulson-Ellis via Digitalmars-d-learn]

On Friday, 29 December 2017 at 21:34:27 UTC, vit wrote:
use:
   n = Nullable!Object.init;   //doesn't call destroy
instead of:
   n.nullify();

Only nullify() can make isNull return true again. I need that 
semantic.