On Monday, 19 March 2018 at 16:33:28 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
I have been staring at this message so long, I have clearly stopped actually reading it, hence outside assistance needed.
So I would guess either there's two definitions of one of the types like maybe `dvb_v5_fe_parms` and the constructor uses one and your code uses another (may be the same struct defined in two different modules, where the definition imported one and you imported another - stupid compiler was (is?) liable to say "type A is not type A" when it should say "type foo.A is not bar.A"), or something like a stray const on the `this` pointer.
I almost remember that A != A bug was fixed but maybe not in function call things, or maybe not pushed to your ldc version yet.
