On Friday, 6 April 2018 at 17:46:26 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
Why isn't `std.conv.emplaceRef` public when `std.conv.emplace` is?AFAICT, emplaceRef(x, ...) is a bit more @safe than emplace(&x, ...) ...
I had the same thoughts too: https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18701We can even do this without introducing a new symbol, but simply let emplace accept pointers and ref like we need with formattedRead for nice backwards compatibility.