On Fri, 2018-07-27 at 15:58 -0400, Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote: > […] > Haha, I don't blame you. The docs should say in bold letters (NOT > IMPLEMENTED).
In the end I used the deprecated leastSize property to create a right size buffer so the read function never tries to read more data than it has. This gets round the exception being thrown and makes for quite a nice solution. The problem is of course the leastSize property is being deprecated. This seems like a bad idea to me, especially given the read function is actually broken with respect reads shorter than the buffer. […] > > I'd be surprised if there isn't some better I/O options in vibe.d. I > mainly use the higher-level features. Any chance of you doing an article on D and vibe.d proper use prompted by this Code Critique so as to show CVu readers what vibe.d is really like – as opposed to the rather negative image readers will get from this Code Critique. -- Russel. =========================================== Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part