On Tuesday, 6 November 2018 at 00:38:01 UTC, MatheusBN wrote:
On Tuesday, 6 November 2018 at 00:13:52 UTC, Stanislav Blinov
wrote:
But here it's fine:
void main(){
{
goto Q;
S x;
} // <---
Q:
writeln("a");
}
because goto jumps over both initialization *and* destruction,
i.e. neither would even be performed.
I see but at same time I found a bit confusing, because in this
case we're just adding a new scope to fix the issue, and like I
said to Jonathan, I thought that "x" wouldn't be initialized
since it is never used.
It's not as simple as that, that's why I specifically showed the
destructor case. Even if you don't see any explicit use, it
doesn't mean the compiler doesn't see an implicit one.
