On 12/5/18 12:00 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
But in cases where you aren't assigning a variable, float[](1.0, 2.1, 3.5) would be more desirable than casting (since casting is dangerous).
Sorry, I meant float[]([1.0, 2.1, 3.5]) -Steve
Re: int[] as constructor
Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d-learn Wed, 05 Dec 2018 09:26:19 -0800
- int[] as constructor jmh530 via Digitalmars-d-learn
- Re: int[] as constructor Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d-learn
- Re: int[] as constructor H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d-learn
- Re: int[] as constructor jmh530 via Digitalmars-d-learn
- Re: int[] as constructor Stanislav Blinov via Digitalmars-d-learn
- Re: int[] as constru... Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d-learn
- Re: int[] as con... Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d-learn
