On 20/12/2018 5:02 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Wednesday, December 19, 2018 1:19:42 AM MST rikki cattermole via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
On 19/12/2018 7:11 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
Really? I would have thought that that would be a pretty obvious
optimization (especially if inlining is enabled).
Assembly doesn't lie.
I'm not saying that you're wrong, just expressing surprise. I've never
checked to see what code actually got generated. But I do think that it's
something that the compiler should be smart enough to do even if it isn't
currently that smart, and the fact that it isn't is most defintely not a
good thing.
- Jonathan M Davis
I agree, this would be a very simple AST rewrite. Would be well worth
doing since its a common-ish pattern.
