Is there any way to build an alias array at compile time that isn't too heavy in resources?

alias arr = Alias!([]);
static foreach(a; A)
{{
    arr.add!a;
}}

and so at the end arr would simply be A, in this case. The reason for the double {{}} is because can't build an alias inside since the scope may be closed for other reasons.

One can use mixins to create an alias for each case and then take the final result if a double scope is not used, but that is problematic in some cases and results in a bunch of aliases.

I need to build a corresponding alias array that doesn't have certain elements in it, I could use filter but that requires duplicating a lot of unnecessary code just to build the sequence.

Filter is defined as

template Filter(alias pred, TList...)
{
    static if (TList.length == 0)
    {
        alias Filter = AliasSeq!();
    }
    else static if (TList.length == 1)
    {
        static if (pred!(TList[0]))
            alias Filter = AliasSeq!(TList[0]);
        else
            alias Filter = AliasSeq!();
    }
    else
    {
        alias Filter =
            AliasSeq!(
                Filter!(pred, TList[ 0  .. $/2]),
                Filter!(pred, TList[$/2 ..  $ ]));
    }
}

which takes a list and builds a new list from it using recursion.

I really don't see why we can't do the reverse and add to a sequence. Maybe a special aliasArray type needs to be created to handle it? It is essentially the same process but in reverse. I realize that one case reduces a pre-existing array while the other builds it up, but it really shouldn't be a huge problem to have both.

After all, we can build up a sequence using unique names so why not simply allow masking of the names?

alias arr1 = AliasSeq!(int);
alias arr2 = AliasSeq!(arr1, double);
alias arr3 = AliasSeq!(arr2, double);

etc...

can simply use arr for the entire set and arr really is arr3.


Reply via email to