On Monday, 8 April 2019 at 19:56:50 UTC, Yuxuan Shui wrote:
In this example:
const(AliasSeq!(int, int)) a;
pragma(msg, typeof(a)); // (int, int)
This kind of make sense, since AliasSeq is not a "single" type.
But silently dropping const seems bad, the compiler should
probably report an error/warning in this case?
It works if you use the "storage class" syntax for const: const AliasSeq!(int, int) a; pragma(msg, typeof(a)); // (const(int), const(int))
