On Saturday, 20 April 2019 at 14:24:34 UTC, 9il wrote:
On Friday, 19 April 2019 at 12:37:10 UTC, Arredondo wrote:Slice!(Contiguous, [2], byte*) payload;BTW, any reason not to use the new version of ndslice? For new API it would be: Slice!(byte*, 2, Contiguous) or just Slice!(byte*, 2)
I think this new ndslice API is newer than my code. I might consider upgrading though, maybe in the new version Slice.field() is const, so I can use my preferred implementation of toHash()?