On 08.02.20 15:57, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
This kind of stuff is so difficult to reason about and develop as a library that people will just end up removing dip1000 from their compilation.
I 100% agree that DIP 1000 is hard to reason about. It's pretty limited by design, and the implementation has so many bugs. If anyone has a better design (and implementation), I'd be all for that.
About just ditching the compiler switch: Then you can't even take the address of a local. Also, it's going to become the default eventually.
