On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 6:14 AM, Ary Borenszweig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > For D2, there's still missing a lot of semantic analysis porting from DMD, > and doing that is kind of boring (adding new features, that's fun). But if I > add features to D1 and it will be gone soon, what's the point? Also, I feel > that the great majority of the people here don't see an IDE as a helpful > programming tool.
If you consider that D2 is more or less a superset of D1, working on D1 features in Descent definitely isn't useless. Most/all of them would carry over.
