bearophile wrote:
Nick Sabalausky:
Oh, right. For some stupid reason I was forgetting that the param would
always be an array and therefore be eligible for the existing array property
syntax (and that .length always returns a uint).
From the len() code I have posted you can see there are other places where you
want to use len(), in particular to count the number of items that a lazy
generator (opApply for now) yields.
Bye,
bearophile
I'm rather weary of a short and suggestive name that embodies a linear
operation. I recall there was a discussion about that a while ago in
this newsgroup. I'd rather call it linearLength or something that
suggests it's a best-effort function that may take O(n).
Andrei
