On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 10:36 PM, bearophile <bearophileh...@lycos.com> wrote:
> system crashes, which have probably caused a billion dollars of pain and > damage in the last forty years. In recent years, a number of program > analysers like PREfix and PREfast in Microsoft have been used to check > references, and give warnings if there is a risk they may be non-null. Is this a typo? Why would you want to give warnings about things that "may be non-null"? --bb
