Michiel Helvensteijn wrote:
Ary Borenszweig wrote:get { return this.len; } set { this.len = value; } // "value" (like in C#), or "$" or something like thatI have to disagree. By that logic, we would abolish parameter-names altogether and access formal parameters by number. set has a parameter, and the programmer should be able to name it.It's very different. A setter has a very specific meaning: set some value. That's why it's called "value". Another name could be the name of the property ("len") or something like "newLen". Which other name would you use?It's not for me to say. It should be up to the programmer. You've already shown that there are at least three possibilities.
Yes, three. And that's it. That was my point. And they all have pretty much the same meaning.
Well, unless you want to name it "nuevaLen", "novaLen", "nouvelleLen", etc. :-P
