Nick Sabalausky: > Yes, but 1. As you indicated, it could only happen in D when using an > initializer on an "auto". And 2. I would imagine that would probably get > caught as soon x was used.
You are right, Python being dynamically typed the situation is a little worse there. > then using "foo" without "&" or "()" should be > prohibited. (In fact, maybe that would be the ideal solution?) That's what I was saying, to disallow "foo" without () or &. It's not the ideal situation but to me it looks better than the current ones (of both Python and D1). Bye, bearophile
