Walter Bright wrote: > downs wrote: >> Walter: I'm certain that you thought changing the behavior of >> volatile was a good idea at the time, ill-defined though it was, but >> let me assure you, the act left a gaping hole in the language. > > You are using the GDC back end, and I don't know what it does with the > volatile information provided by the front end. Please add a bugzilla > bug report for GDC on this.
Filed. Thanks for the advice.
