Stewart Gordon Wrote: > Bill Baxter wrote: > > Qt 4.5 to be LGPL > > http://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09%2F01%2F14%2F1312210 > > > > Now we just need a D port... > > There was Indigo, not exactly a port but a library to mimic Qt's API. > http://www.dsource.org/projects/indigo/ > > But that import is incomplete at the moment - I'll have to see what code > I still have. And maybe the project could be resurrected one of these days. > > Stewart.
I'd say wait and see how the bindings work out. Long term a D port of Qt would be great, but it would take several developers years to get any real percentage of the Qt classes ported, and if the D bindings rock then there is little need (other than just the desire to have to have Qt in a more modern language) Katrina
