Michel Fortin: > with the extension syntax I proposed for class extensions in > D, you wouldn't have that problem (if implemented correctly) because > the compiler would always know from where the function is comming and > could therfore generate code so that the right function is called even > if a function of the same name is added to the underlying library. Hum, > perhaps this needs more explaination.
It sounds like the "scoped monkey patching" I was talking about :-) Bye, bearophile
