Bill Baxter пишет: > Why don't you just show us the class in the way you would like to > write it in C++, and we'll show you how to write it in D, or finally > agree with you that it's not possible. But as long as you continue > to be hand-wavy about "common base classes" we're at a bit of an > impasse. So far everyone thinks D can do what you want it to do based > on your vague descriptions.
Yes, it's a good idea
