Georg Wrede wrote:
Walter Bright wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
There will be a global reference to a Locale class, e.g. defaultLocale. By default the reference will be null, implying the C locale should be in effect. Applications can assign to it as they find fit, and also pass around multiple locale variables.

I disagree with being able to assign to the global defaultLocale. This is going to cause endless problems. Just one is that any function that uses locale can no longer be pure. defaultLocale should be immutable.

The two programs that are most "locale aware" are usually spread sheets and word processors.

It is usual that the user needs to write, say, in Swedish or in Russian, while in a Finnish setting. Or that one wants to use a decimal separator other than what is "proper" for the country.

For example, a lot of people use "." instead of the official "," in Finland, and many use time as "18:23" instead of "18.23".


For this purpose, these programs let the users define these any way they want.

That's exactly what my proposal is doing. People can start with the defaults of the Finnish locale and then overwrite whichever parts they want.

I think the notion of locales is, slowly but steadily, going away.

Do you have any data backing this up?

It was a nice idea at the time, but with two problems: users don't use it, and programmers don't use it.

Is it because it hasn't been properly packaged?

Of course, eventually we will want to "do something" about this. But that should be left to the day when real issues are all sorted out in D. This is a non-urgent, low-priority thing.

I guess. Now please tell me how I print arrays in D.


Andrei

Reply via email to