Georg Wrede wrote:
Walter Bright wrote:
Walter Bright wrote:
When I compile dmd with the old lib, I tick off 50% of the linux
people who don't have the old .so installed. When I compile it with
the new lib, I tick off the other 50% who don't have the new one
installed.
I hope that was some time ago. If there's no solution, I can live with
that.
Seems upgrading libc is non-trivial. Now I know.
I was *intrigued* by the error messages, because I wasn't expecting
anything such. I would've thought that either the source works, or then
not. What's "wrong"?
The source works just fine. The binaries don't. The new lib distros
don't include the old lib, and vice versa. Often the missing lib isn't
available. It's an ongoing nuisance.
It isn't like Windows, where the basic api's have been unchanged for
nearly 20 years.
Mac OSX is the worst of the lot, there you get a "bus error" if you
build for 10.5 and run it on 10.4.
