On Thu, 19 Mar 2009 20:32:54 +0300, Walter Bright <newshou...@digitalmars.com>
wrote:
BCS wrote:
Thu, 19 Mar 2009 06:35:37 -0400, Steve Teale wrote:
for (; a<b; a++);
is illegal in D.
Doesn't this break a lot of C and C++ code?
for (; a<b; a++) {}
is legal. I don't think that an empty statement after for is used in
"a lot of code."
it's a trivial fix and easy to find. Heck, you hardly need to think!
No, it isn't easy to find. This is in D because a colleague of mine, who
was an expert C programmer (the best in the company I was working for),
came to me with:
for (xxx; i < 10; i++);
{
... code ...
}
and said he could not figure out why his loop executed only and exactly
once. He'd fiddled with it for a whole afternoon. He said he must be
missing something obvious. I said you've got an extra ; after the ). He
smacked his head and about fell over backwards.
So it's illegal in D, along with:
if (condition);
and similar constructs. Have to use a { } to indicate a blank statement.
Funny enough, or programming department chief posted the following question in
our corporate newsgroup:
Why the hell this function enters infinite loop?
void treeWalkWithoutRecursion( Node* head )
{
Stack s;
s.push( head );
while ( !s.empty() );
{
Node* tmp = s.pop();
if ( !tmp->marked )
{
if ( tmp->right )
s.push( tmp->right );
s.push( tmp );
if ( tmp->left )
s.push( tmp->left );
tmp->marked = true;
}
else
doSomeThing( tmp );
}
}