Yigal Chripun пишет: > what you suggest is C++ with better syntax, *NOT* a variant of D. for that > look at: > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Significantly_Prettier_and_Easier_C%2B%2B_Syntax >
No! Only because of the "value semantic" returns used pointers instead of references for pointing to objects. > C++ has the wrong semantics which D fixes. No sane person that moved to D > would ever want to go back to C++ and its huge pile of issues. C++ implements > only very basic mechanisms for OOP and even that is done poorly. > > Also, Your point of view about performance and GC is very much outdated and > completely wrong. I will not go into GC implementation details since others > did that already. All I'll say is that C++ will eventually get GC too. it was > planned to be added in C++0x (the new standard that's planned for 2009) but > was postponed because of lack of time and tight deadlines. > > to quote Wikipedia: > <qoute> > Transparent garbage collection > > C++0x will not feature transparent garbage collection directly. Instead, the > C++0x standard will include features that will make it easier to implement > garbage collection in C++. Only optional
